Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):27-41 (2011)
|Abstract||Recently much has been made of the grounding relation, and of the idea that it is intimately tied to fundamentality. If A grounds B, then A is more fundamental than B (though not vice versa ), and A is ungrounded if and only if it is fundamental full stop—absolutely fundamental. But here is a puzzle: is grounding itself absolutely fundamental?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas Kutach (2013). Causation and Its Basis in Fundamental Physics. Oxford University Press.
Jessica M. Wilson (2012). Fundamental Determinables. Philosophers' Imprint 12 (4).
Fabian Schuppert (2013). Distinguishing Basic Needs and Fundamental Interests. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):24-44.
John Worrall (1982). Broken Bootstraps. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 18 (1):105 - 130.
Trogdon Kelly (forthcoming). Grounding: Necessary or Contingent? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
Clark Glymour (1980). Bootstraps and Probabilities. Journal of Philosophy 77 (11):691-699.
John Worrall (1982). Review: Broken Bootstraps. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 18 (1):105 - 130.
Jonathan Schaffer (2010). The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):307 - 324.
Ricki Leigh Bliss (2013). Viciousness and the Structure of Reality. Philosophical Studies 166 (2):399-418.
Barbara Montero (2006). Physicalism in an Infinitely Decomposable World. Erkentnis 64 (2):177-191.
Gordon Belot (2005). Whose Devil? Which Details? Philosophy of Science 72 (1):128-153.
Added to index2011-09-08
Total downloads208 ( #1,537 of 735,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #6,458 of 735,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?