|Abstract||The Declaration of Rights -- I mean the paper published under that name by the French National Assembly in 1791 -- assumes for its subject-matter a field of disquisition as unbounded in point of extent as it is important in its nature. But the more ample the extent given to any proposition or string of propositions, the more difficult it is to keep the import of it confined without deviation, within the bounds of truth and reason. If in the smallest corners of the field it ranges over, it fail of coinciding with the line of rigid rectitude, no sooner is the aberration pointed out, than (inasmuch as there is no medium between truth and falsehood) its pretensions to the appellation of truism are gone, and whoever looks upon it must recognise it to be false and erroneous, -- and if, as here, political conduct be the theme, so far as the error extends and fails of being detected, pernicious|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Stuart D. Warner (1990). The Politics of the Book. Philosophy and Theology 4 (3):223-252.
Louis Pojman (1991). A Critique of Contemporary Egalitarianism. Faith and Philosophy 8 (4):481-504.
Siegfried van Duffel (forthcoming). Natural Rights to Welfare. European Journal of Philosophy.
William K. Frankena (1955). Natural and Inalienable Rights. Philosophical Review 64 (2):212-232.
B. A. Richards (1969). Inalienable Rights: Recent Criticism and Old Doctrine. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (3):391-404.
Terrance McConnell (1984). The Nature and Basis of Inalienable Rights. Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
J. Ci (2005). Taking the Reasons for Human Rights Seriously. Political Theory 33 (2):243 - 265.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads158 ( #2,272 of 549,766 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,766 )
How can I increase my downloads?