Does 'best practice' in setting executive pay in the UK encourage 'good' behaviour?
Journal of Business Ethics 67 (1):75 - 91 (2006)
| Abstract | We examine how UK listed companies set executive pay, reviewing the implications of following best practice in corporate governance and examining how this can conflict with what shareholders and other stakeholders might perceive as good behaviour. We do this by considering current governance regulation in the light of interviews with protagonists in the debate, setting out the dilemmas faced by remuneration-setters, and showing how the processes they follow can lead to ethical conflicts.Current ‘best’ practice governing executive pay includes the use of market benchmarks to determine salary and bonus levels, significant levels of performance-related pay, the desire for executives to hold equity in their companies, the disclosure of total shareholder return compared to an index, and a perceived need for conformity, in order to grant legitimacy to policies. Whilst each of these may in some circumstances lead to good practice, each has the potential to cause dysfunctional behaviour in executives. Overall, we conclude that although best practice might drive good executive behaviour that coincides with the company’s and key stakeholders’ objectives, there are many reasons why it should not | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSamuel M. Natale & Thomas Diamante (2005). The Five Stages of Executive Coaching: Better Process Makes Better Practice. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):361 - 374.
Colin Boyd (1996). Ethics and Corporate Governance: The Issues Raised by the Cadbury Report in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):167 - 182.
Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Gerald J. Lobo & Emad Mohammad (2009). Are Stock Options Grants to Ceos of Stagnant Firms Fair and Justified? Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):137 - 155.
Avshalom M. Adam & Mark S. Schwartz (2009). Corporate Governance, Ethics, and the Backdating of Stock Options. Journal of Business Ethics 85:225 - 237.
Donald Nichols & Chandra Subramaniam (2001). Executive Compensation: Excessive or Equitable? Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):339 - 351.
John Dobson (2011). A Moral and Economic Defense of Executive Compensation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):59-70.
Ronald E. Dulek, William H. Motes & Chadwick B. Hilton (1997). Executive Perceptions of Superior and Subordinate Information Control: Practice Versus Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1175-1184.
Lois Schafer Mahoney & Linda Thorn (2006). An Examination of the Structure of Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Canadian Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):149 - 162.
Ella Mae Matsumura & Jae Yong Shin (2005). Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences. Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):101 - 113.
Julian Friedland (2010). A Fair Wage? Capping Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:129-139.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,507 of 556,896 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,896 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
