Due Consideration: Controversy in the Age of Medical Miracles
Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):353-353 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam E. Stempsey (2002). Miracles and the Limits of Medical Knowledge. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):1 - 9.
Robert H. Ayers (1980). C. S. Peirce on Miracles. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 16 (3):242 - 254.
Peter Harrison (1999). Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument Against Miracles. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
Paul Fitzgerald (1985). Miracles. Philosophical Forum 17:48 - 64.
Richard L. Purtill (1976). Proofs of Miracles and Miracles as Proofs. Christian Scholar’s Review 6.
James E. Taylor (2007). Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.
Keith Ward (1985). Miracles and Testimony. Religious Studies 21 (2):131 - 145.
Terence L. Nichols (2002). Miracles in Science and Theology. Zygon 37 (3):703-716.
Michael Almeida (2007). Martin on Miracles. Philo 10 (1):27-34.
L. J. Schneiderman (2008). Embracing Our Mortality: Hard Choices in an Age of Medical Miracles. Oxford University Press.
John Collier (1986). Against Miracles. Dialogue 25 (02):349-.
Richard Otte (2004). Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
James E. Gilman (1989). Reconceiving Miracles. Religious Studies 25 (4):477 - 487.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-09-13Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
