Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):307-330 (2007)
|Abstract||What is Levinas's relation to Hegel, the thinker who seems to summarize everything which Levinas's philosophy opposes, yet with whom Levinas never enters a sustained philosophical engagement? An answer can be found through an analysis of the concept of work, understood both as activity of labor and product thereof. The concept of work reveals that, despite the apparent (but superficial) sense of opposition, Levinas's philosophy works in a deliberately noncommittal, or, to use a Levinasian expression, ``dis-interested'' mode with respect to Hegel. Such mode of disinterstedness expresses an ethical gesture of joyful hospitality that neither confirms nor refutes the German philosopher but rather opens him up to an eschatological dimension.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Silvia Benso (2008). Aesth-Ethics. Epoché 13 (1):163-183.
Nicholas H. Smith (2008). Levinas, Habermas and Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):643-664.
John Drabinski (2008). On Subjectivity and Political Debt. Levinas Studies 3:101-115.
Ze’Ev Levy (2005). Emmanuel Levinas on Secularization in Modern Society. Levinas Studies 1:19-35.
Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak (ed.) (1995). Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, Literature, and Religion. Routledge.
Stéphane Habib & Raphaël Zagury-Orly (2006). Ce Qui Ne Revient Pas au Meme. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):37-54.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #44,043 of 549,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?