It's About Scientific Secrecy, Dummy: A Better Equilibrium Among Genomics Patenting, Scientific Research and Health Care [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):263-284 (2012)
|Abstract||This paper offers a different pragmatic and patent-based approach to concerns regarding the negative effects of genetic-based patenting on advancing scientific research and providing adequate and accessible health care services. At the basis of this approach lies an explication of a mandatory provisional patented paper procedure (PPPA), designed for genetic-based patents and administered by leading scientific journals in the field, while officially acknowledged by the USPTO, and subsequently by other patent offices as well. It is argued that the uniqueness of PPPAs lies in subsequently mitigating the negative ramifications of genetic patents on scientific research and genetic-based health care services, while basing such mitigation on a patents’ advocate viewpoint that neither discards the patent system nor jeopardizes its integrity|
|Keywords||Patents Challenge Scientific research Health care Resolution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hans Radder (2004). Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):275-291.
David B. Resnik (2001). DNA Patents and Scientific Discovery and Innovation: Assessing Benefits and Risks. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):29-62.
Sean M. O'Connor, Using Insights From the History of Science to Redefine Patentable Subject Matter Under the IP Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Tadeusz Tollocako (2000). Ethical Implications in the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in Poland. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):63-70.
Tadeusz Tołłoczko (2000). Ethical Implications in the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in Poland. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1).
Inmaculada Melo-Martín (2013). Patenting and the Gender Gap: Should Women Be Encouraged to Patent More? Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):491-504.
Dr Marcelin Tonye Mahop, Patents, Scientific and Commercial Use of Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge: How Does Public Interest Fit in This Arena?
Sivaramjani Thambisetty & Kartik Kumaramangalam, Peer-Review and Patents: Why the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg is a Red Herring.
Andrew Askland (2003). Patenting Genes. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):267-275.
Mark J. Hanson (1999). Biotechnology and Commodification Within Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):267 – 287.
Matthew Herder (2006). Proliferating Patent Problems with Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):69-79.
Bryn Williams-Jones & Michael M. Burgess (2004). Social Contract Theory and Just Decision Making: Lessons From Genetic Testing for the BRCA Mutations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):115-142.
Steven P. Wainwright & Angus Forbes (2000). Philosophical Problems with Social Research on Health Inequalities. Health Care Analysis 8 (3):259-277.
R. Stephen Crespi (2000). An Analysis of Moral Issues Affecting Patenting Inventions in the Life Sciences: A European Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):157-180.
Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin (1996). The Morality of Scientific Openness. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.
Added to index2011-02-17
Total downloads2 ( #246,187 of 727,626 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 727,626 )
How can I increase my downloads?