Res Publica 9 (3) (2003)
|Abstract||This paper argues that a liberal state is justified in promoting relationships of conjugal love – the form of relationship that is the basis of the institution of marriage – on the grounds that they are essential to the development and maintenance of autonomy. A deep human need is that the detail of our lives be recognized (accepted, affirmed, granted importance) by others (or by an other). Autonomy can be compromised when this need is not met. So a state concerned with autonomy ought to be concerned with relationships in which people can be given recognition. This argument justifies support for friendship as well as conjugal love; why is the latter particularly special? The answer is that in conjugal love partners value each other exclusively (i.e., in a way they do not value anyone else). Conjugal relations therefore recognise the uniqueness and individual value of a person's life in away that friendship does not|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. W. Price (1989). Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
Lucas Swaine (2010). Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic Virtue and the Chains of Autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):73-93.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ben Colburn (2010). Autonomy and Liberalism. Routledge.
EImer T. Gelinas (1965). Conjugal Love and Fertility Control. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 39:170-176.
Eric Schwitzgebel (2008). Thoughts on Conjugal Love. In Fidelo Leonore.
Deirdre Golash (2006). Marriage, Autonomy, and the State: Reply to Christopher Bennett. Res Publica 12 (2).
Christopher Bennett (2006). Autonomy and Conjugal Love: A Reply to Golash. Res Publica 12 (2).
Roger E. Lamb (ed.) (1997). Love Analyzed. Westview Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #78,648 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?