Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327 (2000)
|Abstract||I present two criticisms: (1) Merge is a model of performance in speech perception experiments but not an ecologically valid model integrating both word recognition and speech perception, and (2) Merge's implementation of the variability of lexical effects must be made more precise or the model is indistinguishable from its alternatives.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gabriella Vigliocco & Marco Zorzi (1999). Contact Points Between Lexical Retrieval and Sentence Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):58-59.
Richard Shillcock (2000). Interaction, Function Words, and the Wider Goals of Speech Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):346-346.
David Reitter, Frank Keller & Johanna D. Moore (2011). A Computational Cognitive Model of Syntactic Priming. Cognitive Science 35 (4):587-637.
Graeme Hirst (1999). What Exactly Are Lexical Concepts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):45-46.
Brendan T. Johns & Michael N. Jones (2012). Perceptual Inference Through Global Lexical Similarity. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):103-120.
Irene Appelbaum (2000). Merging Information Versus Speech Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326.
M. Gareth Gaskell (2000). Modeling Lexical Effects on Phonetic Categorization and Semantic Effects on Word Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):329-330.
Louisa M. Slowiaczek (2000). Hesitations and Clarifications on a Model to Abandon Feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):347-347.
Dennis Norris, James M. McQueen & Cutler (2000). Merging Information in Speech Recognition: Feedback is Never Necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):299-325.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?