Logical Semantics as an Empirical Science
Studia Logica 42 (2/3):299 - 313 (1983)
| Abstract | Exact philosophy consists of various disciplines scattered and separated. Formal semantics and philosophy of science are good examples of two such disciplines. The aim of this paper is to show that there is possible to find some integrating bridge topics between the two fields, and to show how insights from the one are illuminating and suggestive in the other. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohan van Benthem (1983). Logical Semantics as an Empirical Science. Studia Logica 42 (2-3).
Juan Barba (2007). Formal Semantics in the Age of Pragmatics. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):637-668.
Thomas E. Uebel & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
Johan Benthem (1982). The Logical Study of Science. Synthese 51 (3):431 - 472.
Michael D. Resnik (1985). Logic: Normative or Descriptive? The Ethics of Belief or a Branch of Psychology? Philosophy of Science 52 (2):221-238.
Johan van Benthem & Dag Westerståhl (1995). Directions in Generalized Quantifier Theory. Studia Logica 55 (3):389-419.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
