Graduate studies at Western
Studia Logica 42 (2/3):299 - 313 (1983)
|Abstract||Exact philosophy consists of various disciplines scattered and separated. Formal semantics and philosophy of science are good examples of two such disciplines. The aim of this paper is to show that there is possible to find some integrating bridge topics between the two fields, and to show how insights from the one are illuminating and suggestive in the other.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Johan van Benthem (1983). Logical Semantics as an Empirical Science. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):299-313.
Juan Barba (2007). Formal Semantics in the Age of Pragmatics. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):637-668.
Thomas E. Uebel & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
Johan Benthem (1982). The Logical Study of Science. Synthese 51 (3):431 - 472.
Michael D. Resnik (1985). Logic: Normative or Descriptive? The Ethics of Belief or a Branch of Psychology? Philosophy of Science 52 (2):221-238.
Johan van Benthem & Dag Westerståhl (1995). Directions in Generalized Quantifier Theory. Studia Logica 55 (3):389-419.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #291,948 of 733,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?