Graduate studies at Western
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (2):365-383 (2011)
|Abstract||This discussion paper proposes that a meaningful distinction between science and technoscience can be found at the level of the objects of research. Both notions intermingle in the attitudes, intentions, programs and projects of researchers and research institutions—that is, on the side of the subjects of research. But the difference between science and technoscience becomes more explicit when research results are presented in particular settings and when the objects of research are exhibited for the specific interest they hold. When an experiment is presented as scientific evidence which confirms or disconfirms a hypothesis, this agrees with traditional conceptions of science. When organic molecules are presented for their capacity to serve individually as electric wires that carry surprisingly large currents, this would be a hallmark of technoscience. Accordingly, we propose research on the ontology of research objects. The focus on the character and significance of research objects makes this a specifically philosophical project|
|Keywords||Ontology Research objects Technoscience Dispositions Affordances Philosophy of scientiﬁc experimentation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jan Schmidt (2011). The Renaissance of Francis Bacon. Nanoethics 5 (1):29-41.
Karen Kastenhofer (2010). Do We Need a Specific Kind of Technoscience Assessment? Taking the Convergence of Science and Technology Seriously. Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):37-54.
Ulrich Fiedeler (2011). When Does the Co-Evolution of Technology and Science Overturn Into Technoscience? Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):83-101.
Kjetil Rommetveit (2008). Towards a Hermeneutic of Technomedical Objects. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (2):103-120.
Jutta Weber (2010). Making Worlds: Epistemological, Ontological and Political Dimensions of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):17-36.
Ramón Queraltó (2008). The Philosophical Impact of Technoscience or the Development of a Pragmatic Philosophy of Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.
Barry Barnes (2005). Elusive Memories of Technoscience. Perspectives on Science 13 (2):142-165.
Ursula Klein (2005). Technoscience. Perspectives on Science 13 (2).
Greg Bamford (2003). Research, Knowledge and Design. In Clare Newton, Sandra Kaj-O'Grady & Simon Wollan (eds.), Design + Research: Project Based Research in Architecture. Second International Conference of the Association of Australasian Schools of Architecture, Melbourne 28 – 30 September, 2003. Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia.
Robert Scharff (2011). Displacing Epistemology: Being in the Midst of Technoscientific Practice. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 16 (2):227-243.
Adil E. Shamoo (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford University Press.
Wendy Baldwin (2002). Conflict of Interest and its Significance in Science and Medicine Warsaw, Poland, 5–6 April, 2002. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):469-475.
Sacha Loeve (2012). From Setting the Distance to Adjusting the Focus. Metascience 22 (1):1-6.
Uljana Feest (2011). Remembering (Short-Term) Memory: Oscillations of an Epistemic Thing. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 75 (3):391-411.
Added to index2011-10-30
Total downloads34 ( #40,578 of 729,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #6,120 of 729,711 )
How can I increase my downloads?