David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):20-38 (2012)
In his seminars on the death penalty, Derrida consistently describes Kant's arguments in favor of capital punishment as “rigorous” and explicitly relates that rigor to the mechanisms of execution and the subsequent rigor mortis of the corpse. ‘Rigor’ has also often been a contested term in descriptions of deconstruction: different commentators have either deplored or celebrated the presence or the absence of rigor in Derrida's work. Derrida himself uses the term a good deal throughout his career, usually in a positive sense, although he also at least once, in passing, suggests the need to question the rigor of the concept of rigor itself. In this paper, I will outline the place of Kant in the Death Penalty Seminars and suggest that it is the very rigor attributed to Kant that makes him (rather than some other writers—whether supporters or opponents of the death penalty—whose arguments seem less rigorous to Derrida) an exemplary object for deconstructive attention, not for the first time in Derrida's work. Broadening the focus beyond the texts Derrida explicitly analyzes, I suggest that this kind of attention can also be fruitfully brought to bear on some more general arguments in Kant about right and justice. In conclusion, I suggest some implications of this situation for the still difficult issue of the more general relation between deconstruction and critique in the Kantian sense
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marguerite la Caze (2009). Derrida: Opposing Death Penalties. Derrida Today 2 (2):186-199.
Thomas Dutoit (2012). Kant's Retreat, Hugo's Advance, Freud's Erection; or, Derrida's Displacements in His Death Penalty Lectures. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):107-135.
Michael Naas (2012). The Philosophy and Literature of the Death Penalty: Two Sides of the Same Sovereign. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):39-55.
Matthias Fritsch (2012). Derrida on the Death Penalty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):56-73.
Elizabeth Rottenberg (2012). Cruelty and its Vicissitudes: Jacques Derrida and the Future of Psychoanalysis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):143-159.
Olivia Custer (2012). Angling for a Stranglehold on the Death Penalty. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):160-173.
Kas Saghafi (2012). The Death Penalty, in Other Words, Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):136-142.
Kelly Oliver (2012). See Topsy “Ride the Lightning”: The Scopic Machinery of Death. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):74-94.
Peggy Kamuf (2012). Protocol: Death Penalty Addiction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (s1):5-19.
Joshua Kates (2008). Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction. Fordham University Press.
Martin McQuillan (2009). Extra Time and the Death Penalties: On a Newly Arisen Violent Tone in Philosophy. Derrida Today 2 (2):133-150.
Samir Haddad (2006). Reading Derrida Reading Derrida: Deconstruction as Self-Inheritance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):505 – 520.
Nelson T. Potter (2002). Kant and Capital Punishment Today. Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2-3):267-282.
Added to index2012-08-10
Total downloads11 ( #136,412 of 1,101,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,870 of 1,101,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?