Synthese 51 (3):431 - 472 (1982)
|Abstract||The relation between logic and philosophy of science, often taken for granted, is in fact problematic. Although current fashionable criticisms of the usefulness of logic are usually mistaken, there are indeed difficulties which should be taken seriously — having to do, amongst other things, with different scientific mentalities in the two disciplines (section 1). Nevertheless, logic is, or should be, a vital part of the theory of science. To make this clear, the bulk of this paper is devoted to the key notion of a scientific theory in a logical perspective. First, various formal explications of this notion are reviewed (section 2), then their further logical theory is discussed (section 3). In the absence of grand inspiring programs like those of Klein in mathematics or Hilbert in metamathematics, this preparatory ground-work is the best one can do here. The paper ends on a philosophical note, discussing applicability and merits of the formal approach to the study of science (section 4).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barbara Tuchanska (1992). What is Explained in Science? Philosophy of Science 59 (1):102-119.
R. M. Martin (1963). Performance, Purpose, and Permission. Philosophy of Science 30 (2):122-137.
Samir Chopra & Eric Martin (2002). Generalized Logical Consequence: Making Room for Induction in the Logic of Science. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (3):245-280.
Hartry Field (2002). Saving the Truth Schema From Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):1-27.
Erik C. W. Krabbe (1985). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese 63 (3):295 - 328.
Erick C. W. Krabbe (1984). Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules. Synthese 58 (2):295 - 328.
Lloyd Humberstone (2008). Parts and Partitions. Theoria 66 (1):41-82.
J. P. Cleave (1991). A Study of Logics. Oxford University Press.
Eli Dresner (2010). Logical Consequence and First-Order Soundness and Completeness: A Bottom Up Approach. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):75-93.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?