Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):558–572 (2007)
|Abstract||According to the purist war ethic, the killings committed by soldiers fighting in just wars are permissible, but those committed by unjust combatants are nothing but murders. Jeff McMahan asserts that purism is a direct consequence of the justice-based account of self-defence. I argue that this is incorrect: the justice-based conception entails that in many typical cases, killing unjust combatants is morally unjustified. So real purism is much closer to pacifism than its proponents would like it to be. I conclude that the best explanation of the common view that unjust combatants may be defensively killed relies on a rights-based conception of self-defence|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeff McMahan (2004). The Ethics of Killing in War. Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Steve Viner (2010). Self-Defense, Punishing Unjust Combatants and Justice in War. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319.
Igor Primoratz (2002). Michael Walzer's Just War Theory: Some Issues of Responsibility. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):221-243.
Nolen Gertz (2008). Just and Unjust Killing. Journal of Military Ethics 7 (4):247-261.
Jeff McMahan (2006). The Ethics of Killing in War. Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.
Uwe Steinhoff (2010). Benbaji on Killing in War and 'the War Convention'. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):616-623.
Helen Frowe (2012). Self-Defence and the Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):530-546.
Lene Bomann-Larsen (2004). Licence to Kill? The Question of Just Vs. Unjust Combatants. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160.
Jordy Rocheleau (2010). Combatant Responsibility for Fighting in Unjust Wars. Social Philosophy Today 26:93-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #38,062 of 722,936 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,936 )
How can I increase my downloads?