Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):43 - 53 (2006)
|Abstract||This paper examines the associations among social desirability response bias, cultural constructs and gender. The study includes the responses of 1537 students from 12 countries including Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Hong Kong, Ireland, Japan, Nepal, South Africa, Spain, and the United States. The results of the analysis indicate that, on average, social desirability response bias decreases (increases) as a country’s Individualism (Uncertainty Avoidance) increases. The analysis also indicates that women scored significantly higher on Paulhus’ Image Management Subscale on an overall basis and for seven of the 12 country comparisons. This research serves as a caution when considering the research findings of prior international survey-based ethics research that do not include a direct measure of social desirability response bias. For example, the finding that women score higher on Paulhus’ measure of social desirability response bias calls into question prior research that does not control for social desirability response bias indicating women are more ethically sensitive than men.|
|Keywords||Hofstede’s cultural constructs Social desirability response Bias|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mee-Kau Nyaw & Ignace Ng (1994). A Comparative Analysis of Ethical Beliefs: A Four Country Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):543 - 555.
Joseph A. Bellizzi & Terry Bristol (2005). Supervising the Unethical Selling Behavior of Top Sales Performers: Assessing the Impact of Social Desirability Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (4):377 - 388.
Paul Dunn & Anamitra Shome (2009). Cultural Crossvergence and Social Desirability Bias: Ethical Evaluations by Chinese and Canadian Business Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):527 - 543.
Richard Bernardi, Caryn Lecca, Jennifer Murphy & Elizabeth Sturgis (2011). Does Education Influence Ethical Decisions? An International Study. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):235-256.
Donna M. Randall & Maria F. Fernandes (1991). The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):805 - 817.
A. Bernardi Richard, B. Witek Michael & R. Melton Michael (2009). A Four-Country Study of the Associations Between Bribery and Unethical Actions. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3).
Richard A. Bernardi, Michael B. Witek & Michael R. Melton (2009). A Four-Country Study of the Associations Between Bribery and Unethical Actions. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):389 - 403.
Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe (2003). Exploring Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
Richard A. Bernardi & Steven T. Guptill (2008). Social Desirability Response Bias, Gender, and Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment: An International Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):797 - 809.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,123 of 722,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?