An intellectual legacy of the past: The reception of sociobiology in the east-european countries
Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):399-407 (1993)
| Abstract | Sociobiology has not been well received in Eastern Europe. Reasons for this are listed and discussed. It is suggested that times are changing and that sociobiology will have more success in the future. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMax J. Skidmore (2011). On the Meeting of East and West: An Essay on Credulity. The European Legacy 16 (4):519 - 526.
Antony Flew (1994). E. O. Wilson After Twenty Years: Is Human Sociobiology Possible? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (3):320-335.
Alek Epstein (2011). A Land of Two Nations: Baruch Kimmerling's Intellectual Legacy. The European Legacy 16 (4):531 - 534.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
R. Paul Thompson (1980). Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Li Jianhui & Hong Fan (2003). Science as Ideology: The Rejection and Reception of Sociobiology in China. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):567 - 578.
Osamu Sakura (1998). Similarities and Varieties: A Brief Sketch on the Reception of Darwinism and Sociobiology in Japan. Biology and Philosophy 13 (3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,498 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
