Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):399-407 (1993)
|Abstract||Sociobiology has not been well received in Eastern Europe. Reasons for this are listed and discussed. It is suggested that times are changing and that sociobiology will have more success in the future.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Max J. Skidmore (2011). On the Meeting of East and West: An Essay on Credulity. The European Legacy 16 (4):519 - 526.
Antony Flew (1994). E. O. Wilson After Twenty Years: Is Human Sociobiology Possible? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (3):320-335.
Alek Epstein (2011). A Land of Two Nations: Baruch Kimmerling's Intellectual Legacy. The European Legacy 16 (4):531 - 534.
Michael Ruse (1987). Is Sociobiology a New Paradigm? Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
R. Paul Thompson (1980). Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Jason M. Byron (2005). Sociobiology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robert L. Simon (1982). The Sociobiology Muddle:On Human Nature. Edward O. Wilson; The Sociobiology Debate. Arthur L. Caplan; Human Sociobiology: A Holistic Approach. Daniel G. Freedman; Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? Michael Ruse. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (2):327-.
Li Jianhui & Hong Fan (2003). Science as Ideology: The Rejection and Reception of Sociobiology in China. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):567 - 578.
Osamu Sakura (1998). Similarities and Varieties: A Brief Sketch on the Reception of Darwinism and Sociobiology in Japan. Biology and Philosophy 13 (3).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,498 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?