Belief, apparitions, and rationality: The social scientific study of religion after Wittgenstein [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 28 (1):15 - 39 (2005)
The goal I pursue is to redefine the study of religious epistemology on the basis of an ethnomethodological extension of Wittgenstein. This approach shows that the nature of religious belief and its relation to facts, proofs, and empirical reality are matters that are dealt with by ordinary members of society. The examination of this lay epistemology reveals that – far from being a settled and established entity – religious belief is a polymorphous phenomenon. Religious belief is a pragmatic resource whose configuration is shaped to allow the accomplishment of interactional moves within specific contexts. I defend this thesis by analyzing accounts pertaining to a contemporary religious apparition claim.
|Keywords||apparitions epistemology ethnomethodology interactions rationality religious belief Wittgenstein|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Derek A. McDougall (1972). Religious Belief and Philosophical Analysis. Mind 81 (324):519-532.
David Michael Levin (1969). Reasons and Religious Belief. Inquiry 12 (1-4):371 – 393.
Ilkka Pyysia¨Inen (2003). True Fiction: Philosophy and Psychology of Religious Belief. Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):109-125.
Ilkka Pyysiäinen (2003). True Fiction: Philosophy and Psychology of Religious Belief. Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):109 – 125.
Gary Gutting (1999). An Historical Perspective on Religious Epistemology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:103-113.
Bob Plant (2004). The Wretchedness of Belief: Wittgenstein on Guilt, Religion, and Recompense. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):449 - 476.
Michael Murray, Four Arguments That the Cognitive Psychology of Religion Undermines the Justification of Religious Belief.
Michael C. Banner (1990). The Justification of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
Michael Kober (2006). Wittgenstein and Religion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):87-116.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #105,884 of 1,410,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,536 )
How can I increase my downloads?