Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50 (2007)
|Abstract||My purpose is to compare Berkeley’s and Gentile’s idealism, interpreting Berkeley’s Treatise, §§22–23, and Gentile’s reading of this passage. The Italianphilosopher finds in Berkeley’s master argument the original source of the true idealistic way of thinking, but he believes that Berkeley has not been sufficientlyconsistent in deducing all the consequences from his new principle. This criticism is the ground of Gentile’s actual idealism. Comparing the two positions isvery instructive both to elucidate the general issue of idealism and to understand Berkeley’s philosophy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ernest Sosa (1985). Berkeley's Master Stroke. In John Foster & Howard Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford University Press.
David Berman (2005). Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. Thoemmes Continuum.
Marc A. Hight (2007). Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458.
Jennifer Smalligan Marusic (2009). Comments on Michael Jacovides “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive”. Philosophia 37 (3):431-436.
Walter R. Ott (2004). The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Thomas M. Lennon (2011). The Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley's Theory: Idealism and Perceptual Heterogeneity. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):91-115.
George Botterill (2007). God and First Person in Berkeley. Philosophy 82 (1):87-114.
Georges Dicker (2011). Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,845 of 722,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?