Carnap and Frege on ontology
| Abstract | On several occasions Carnap acknowledged Frege’s influence on his work. However, one area where he believed that Frege had got it all wrong was ontology. In this paper I examine to what extent Frege’s realist ontology is in conflict with Carnap’s principle of tolerance. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesEric Loomis & Cory Juhl (2009). Analyticity. Routledge.
Cory Juhl (2009). Analyticity. Routledge.
Michael David Resnik (1965). Frege's Theory of Incomplete Entities. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):329-341.
Marc Alspector-Kelly (2001). On Quine on Carnap on Ontology. Philosophical Studies 102 (1):93 - 122.
Matti Eklund (2009). Carnap and Ontological Pluralism. In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Gregory Lavers (2004). Carnap, Semantics and Ontology. Erkenntnis 60 (3):295-316.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
Matthew C. Haug (2012). On the Prospects for Ontology: Deflationism, Pluralism, and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
