Conatus, Hobbes, and the young Leibniz
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (1):25-37 (1980)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStewart Duncan (2010). Leibniz on Hobbes's Materialism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
Juhani Pietarinen (2001). Conatus as Active Power in Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 14 (1):71-82.
Martin A. Bertman (2001). Conatus in Hobbes' De Corpore. Hobbes Studies 14 (1):25-39.
Christopher Johns (2009). The Grounds of Right and Obligation in Leibniz and Hobbes. The Review of Metaphysics 62 (3):551-574.
Severin V. Kitanov (2012). Happiness in a Mechanistic Universe: Thomas Hobbes on the Nature and Attainability of Happiness. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):117-136.
Markku Roinila (2003). Mekaanisia tahtomuksia. In Sara Heinämaa, Martina Reuter & Mikko Yrjönsuuri (eds.), Spiritus animalis: kirjoituksia filosofian historiasta. Gaudeamus.
Laurence Carlin (2004). Leibniz on Conatus, Causation, and Freedom. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):365–379.
Agostino Lupoli (2001). Power (Conatus-Endeavour) in the "Kinetic Actualism" and in the "Inertial" Psychology of Thomas Hobbes1. Hobbes Studies 14 (1):83-103.
Marine Picon (2009). « On the Constitution of Leibniz’s Formalism ». In Mark Kulstad, Mogens Laerke & David Snyder (eds.), The Philosophy of the Young Leibniz. Steiner.
Thomas Hobbes (1995). Thomas Hobbes: Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes. University of Chicago Press.
Samuel Levey (2001). The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy (1646-76). The Leibniz Review 11:59-62.
Brandon C. Look, Leibniz's Modal Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ursula Goldenbaum (2007). Why Shouldn't Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza? The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Jack D. Davidson (2003). Leibniz on the Labyrinth of Freedom. The Leibniz Review 13:19-43.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-02Total downloads19 ( #64,434 of 549,594 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,594 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
