Comment: Laterality and Evaluative Bivalence: A Neuroevolutionary Perspective

Emotion Review 3 (3):344-346 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rutherford and Lindell (2011) review an extensive literature on lateralization of emotion. As they note, an important issue surrounding this question is the nature of emotion, which bears on what, precisely, is lateralized. The present comments are intended to broaden the context of the review, by considering lateralization from the standpoint of a bivariate model of evaluative processes and a neuroevolutionary perspective

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotion, perception and perspective.Julien A. Deonna - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (1):29–46.
The limits of sentimentalism.François Schroeter - 2006 - Ethics 116 (2):337-361.
More Experiments in Ethics.Kwame Anthony Appiah - 2010 - Neuroethics 3 (3):233-242.
Culturalist Moral Realism.Arto Laitinen - 2002 - In Arto Laitinen & Nicholas H. Smith (eds.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of Charles Taylor. Acta Philosophica Fennica. pp. 115-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
49 (#310,442)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?