David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 22 (3):357-370 (2004)
G. H. Mead's model of language and mind, while perhaps understandable at the time it was written, now seems inadequate. First, the research evidence strongly suggests that mental operations exist prior to language onset, conversation of gestures, or social interaction. Second, language is not just significant symbols; it requires syntax. Third, syntax seems to be part of our bioinheritance, that is, part of our presocial mind/brain-what Noam Chomsky has called our language faculty. Fourth, this means syntax probably is not learned nor a social construction that is internalized as a cultural template. Fifth, this suggests a basic reversal of the prevailing model of symbolic interaction, mind, language, and perhaps the self as well, although there has not been the time or space to engage that topic here. Therefore, symbolic interaction may turn out to be a more Chomskyan than Meadian process. Given the bioinheritance of our mind/brain we are able to engage in symbolic interaction; it does not appear that symbolic interaction creates our mind or the basic computational algorithms of language
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Peterson (2012). Where the Sidewalk Ends: The Limits of Social Constructionism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):465-484.
Jørn Bjerre (2012). Does Infant Cognition Research Undermine Sociological Theory? A Critique of Bergesen's Attack on Durkheim. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):444-464.
Albert J. Bergesen (2012). Turning Durkheim on His Head: A Reply to Peterson and Bjerre. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):485-495.
Timothy J. Gallagher (2014). A Mead‐Chomsky Comparison Reveals a Set of Key Questions on the Nature of Language and Mind. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (2):148-167.
O. Lizardo (2009). Formalism , Behavioral Realism and the Interdisciplinary Challenge in Sociological Theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (1):39-80.
Similar books and articles
Fred D'Agostino (2001). Double Review: Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals by Neil Smith and Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics by James McGilvray. Mind and Language 16 (3):335–344.
James A. McGilvray (1998). Meanings Are Syntactically Individuated and Found in the Head. Mind and Language 13 (2):225-280.
Noam Chomsky (2005). Language and Mind : Current Thoughts on Ancient Problems. In Anjum P. Saleemi, Ocke-Schwen Bohn & Albert Gjedde (eds.), In Search of a Language for the Mind-Brain: Can the Multiple Perspectives Be Unified? Aarhus University Press ;.
Kristian Tylén, Ethan Weed, Mikkel Wallentin, Andreas Roepstorff & Chris D. Frith (2010). Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds. Mind and Language 25 (1):3-29.
Boris Kotchoubey (2005). Pragmatics, Prosody, and Evolution: Language is More Than a Symbolic System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):136-137.
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis (2004). Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children's Social Understanding Within Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):79-96.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Giorgio Marchetti (2010). Editorial: Brain, Mind and Language Functional Architectures. Open Neuroimaging Journal 4:26-29.
Noam Chomsky (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #61,174 of 1,098,992 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #175,277 of 1,098,992 )
How can I increase my downloads?