Devitt on Moral Realism

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):63-68 (2006)
Abstract In this article the author criticizes Michael Devitt’s Naturalistic Moral Realism, as well as that program in general. The author argues the following: moral explanations do not work; the fact that moral featuressupervene on the non-moral ones does not support the thesis of Realism; moral principles can not be tested like factual ones; Moral Realists Naturalists water down their thesis so much that it ceases to be a form of realism; there are no moral observations in any interesting sense
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Michael Devitt (2002). Moral Realism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-15.
    Mark T. Nelson (2006). Moral Realism and Program Explanation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):417 – 428.
    Richard Joyce (2002). Moral Realism and Teleosemantics. Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):723-31.
    Charles Sayward (1989). Do Moral Explanations Matter? Philosophy Research Archives 14:137-142.
    JeeLoo Liu (2007). Confucian Moral Realism. Asian Philosophy 17 (2):167 – 184.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    3 ( #202,056 of 549,628 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,397 of 549,628 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums