Epistemic circularity and common sense: A reply to Reed
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198–207 (2006)
| Abstract | When one depends on a belief source in sustaining a belief that that very belief source is trustworthy, then that belief is an epistemically circular belief (EC-belief).[1]Â A number of philosophers have objected to externalism in epistemology on the grounds that it commits one to thinking EC-beliefs can be justified, something they view as.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Michael Williams (2007). Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism Is Not Relativism. Episteme 4 (1):93-114.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Does Belief Aim (Only) at the Truth? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
C. S. I. Jenkins (2011). Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity. Philosophical Papers 40 (3):305-325.
Aviad Heifetz (1999). Iterative and Fixed Point Common Belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):61-79.
Baron Reed (2006). Epistemic Circularity Squared? Skepticism About Common Sense. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):186–197.
Catherine Z. Elgin (2008). Trustworthiness. Philosophical Papers 37 (3):371-387.
Anne Meylan (2011). Epistemic Circularity and the Problem of Cheap Credit. Philosophical Papers 40 (3):327-340.
David J. Alexander (2011). In Defense of Epistemic Circularity. Acta Analytica 26 (3):223-241.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #56,076 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,222 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |

