Eight-dimensional methodology for innovative thinking about the case and ethics of the Mount Graham, large binocular telescope project
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):235-242 (2004)
This paper introduces the Eight Dimensional Methodology for Innovative Thinking (the Eight Dimensional Methodology), for innovative problem solving, as a unified approach to case analysis that builds on comprehensive problem solving knowledge from industry, business, marketing, math, science, engineering, technology, arts, and daily life. It is designed to stimulate innovation by quickly generating unique “out of the box” unexpected and high quality solutions. It gives new insights and thinking strategies to solve everyday problems faced in the workplace, by helping decision makers to see otherwise obscure alternatives and solutions. Daniel Raviv, the engineer who developed the Eight Dimensional Methodology, and paper co-author, technology ethicist Rosalyn Berne, suggest that this tool can be especially useful in identifying solutions and alternatives for particular problems of engineering, and for the ethical challenges which arise with them. First, the Eight Dimensional Methodology helps to elucidate how what may appear to be a basic engineering problem also has ethical dimensions. In addition, it offers to the engineer a methodology for penetrating and seeing new dimensions of those problems.
|Keywords||ethics innovation problem solving eight dimensions creativity technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anna Weller, Gaëlle Villejoubert & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau (2011). Interactive Insight Problem Solving. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):424 - 439.
Elvio Baccarini (2009). Moral Epistemological Coherentism, Contextualism, and Consensualism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):69-89.
Hugh G. Petrie (1968). The Strategy Sense of 'Methodology'. Philosophy of Science 35 (3):248-257.
Edmond A. Murphy (1997). Underpinnings of Medical Ethics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cameron Shelley (2012). Fairness in Technological Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):663-680.
Kenneth Bausch (2002). New Methods for Streamlining Theory Building. World Futures 58 (2 & 3):229 – 240.
Christopher B. Gray (2010). The Methodology of Maurice Hauriou: Legal, Sociological, Philosophical. Rodopi.
Haldun M. Ozaktas (2013). Teaching Science, Technology, and Society to Engineering Students: A Sixteen Year Journey. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1439-1450.
Simon Robinson (ed.) (2007). Engineering, Business and Professional Ethics. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #150,602 of 1,725,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,621 of 1,725,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?