Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 152 (1):17-39 (2011)
|Abstract||After summarizing the essential details of Anil Gupta’s account of perceptual justification in his book _Empiricism and Experience_, I argue for three claims: (1) Gupta’s proposal is closer to rationalism than advertised; (2) there is a major lacuna in Gupta’s account of how convergence in light of experience yields absolute entitlements to form beliefs; and (3) Gupta has not adequately explained how ordinary courses of experience can lead to convergence on a commonsense view of the world.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. Gaskin (2008). Review: Anil Gupta: Empiricism and Experience. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (465):187-191.
Anil Gupta (2009). Equivalence, Reliability, and Convergence: Replies to McDowell, Peacocke, and Neta. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):490-508.
Eduardo Alejandro Barrio (2002). Verdad y Circularidad. Theoria 17 (1):63-79.
Christopher Peacocke (2009). Perception, Content and Rationality. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):475 - 481.
Anil Gupta (2012). An Account of Conscious Experience. Analytic Philosophy 53 (1):1-29.
Alan Millar (2007). Review of Anil Gupta, Empiricism and Experience. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).
Anil Gupta (2011). Replies to Selim Berker and Karl Schafer. Philosophical Studies 152 (1):41 - 53.
A. Gupta (2006). Empiricism and Experience. Harvard University Press.
Karl Schafer (2011). The Rationalism in Anil Gupta's "Empiricism and Experience". Philosophical Studies 152 (1):1 - 15.
Added to index2009-11-07
Total downloads51 ( #24,419 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,222 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?