|Abstract||The institutional theory of property is that view that property rights are entirely and essentially conventional and are the creatures of states and coercively backed legal systems. In this paper, I argue that, although states and legal systems have a valuable role in deﬁning property rights, the institutional story is not the whole story. Rather, the property rights hat we have reason to recognize as part of justice are partly conventional in character and partly rooted in universal human interests and dispositions.|
|Keywords||justice property institutions naturalism Kant poltical philosophy rights natural rights liberalism|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
J. W. Harris (2002). Property and Justice. OUP Oxford.
Larry May (1986). Corporate Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):225 - 232.
J. M. Elegido (1995). Intrinsic Limitations of Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):411 - 416.
Rowan Cruft (2006). Against Individualistic Justifications of Property Rights. Utilitas 18 (2):154-172.
Robert E. Goodin (1990). Property Rights and Preservationist Duties. Inquiry 33 (4):401 – 432.
Hugh Breakey (2010). Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain. Modern Law Review 73 (2):208-239.
Hugh Breakey (2009). Liberalism and Intellectual Property Rights. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):329-349.
Richard Ashcraft (1994). Exclusive and Inclusive Theories of Property Rights: Rejoinder to Horne. Critical Review 8 (3):435-440.
A. John Simmons (1998). Makers' Rights. Journal of Ethics 2 (3):197-218.
L. Wenar (1998). Original Acquisition of Private Property. Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads78 ( #10,183 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,483 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?