'Law and order' and civil disobedience

Inquiry 13 (1-4):254 – 273 (1970)
Law and order ranks high among the values the State is thought to achieve. Civil disobedience is often condemned because it is held to threaten law and order. Several senses of 'order' are distinguished, which make clear why 'law' and 'order' are so often linked. It is then argued that the connection cannot always be made since the legal system may itself create disorder. Civil disobedience may contribute to greater order and a more stable legal system by helping to remove these causes of disorder. Thus, civil disobedience is sometimes justifiable in terms of its contribution to law and order.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201747008601593
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,209
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1964). Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. In Sidney Hook (ed.), Law and Philosophy. [New York]New York University Press
Stuart M. Brown Jr (1961). Civil Disobedience. Journal of Philosophy 58 (22):669-681.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

59 ( #80,901 of 1,941,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #272,533 of 1,941,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.