David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (3):257--271 (2009)
In this paper I critique two popular, non-scientific attitudes toward genetically engineered foods. In doing so, I will be employing the concepts of ambiguity, purity/impurity, control/resistance, and unity/diversity as developed by Latina feminist metaphysicians. I begin by casting a critical eye toward a specific anti-biotech account of transgenic food crops, an account that I will argue relies on an anti-feminist metaphysics. I then cast that same critical eye toward a specific pro-biotech account, arguing that it also relies on such an anti-feminist metaphysics. I will argue further that this metaphysics yields a less accurate account of genetics. I end by arguing that if we adopt a Latina feminist metaphysics we can more accurately understand plants, genetics, and genetic engineering.
|Keywords||Ambiguity Aztec philosophy Genetic engineering Latina feminist metaphysics Purity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Linda Martín Alcoff, Bat-Ami Bar On, Laura Cannon, Ann Ferguson, Marilyn Frye, Alison M. Jaggar, Alison Kafer, Jean Keller, Sarah Clark Miller, Michele Moody-Adams, Lisa Tessman & Shelley Wilcox (2005). Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Harold W. Baillie, William A. Galston, Sara Goering, Deborah Hellman, Mark Sagoff, Paul B. Thompson, Robert Wachbroit, David T. Wasserman & Richard M. Zaner (2003). Genetic Prospects: Essays on Biotechnology, Ethics, and Public Policy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
James Maffie (2000). 'Like a Painting, We Will Be Erased; Like a Flower, We Will Dry Up Here on Earth': Ultimate Reality and Meaning According to Nahua Philosophy in the Age of Conquest. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 23 (4):295-318.
John Stuart Mill (1874/1970). Three Essays on Religion. New York,Ams Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Helena Siipi (2013). Is Natural Food Healthy? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):797-812.
Naomi Scheman (2012). Toward a Sustainable Epistemology. Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):471-489.
Similar books and articles
Assya Pascalev (2003). You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594.
Sally Haslanger (2000). Feminism and Metaphysics: Unmasking Hidden Ontologies. Apa Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 99 (2):192--196.
Charlotte Witt (ed.) (2011). Feminist Metaphysics. Springer Verlag.
Kirsten Hansen (2004). Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Robert Streiffer & Alan Rubel (2004). Democratic Principles and Mandatory Labeling of Genetically Engineered Food. Public Affairs Quarterly 18 (3):223-248.
Claire Colebrook (1997). Feminist Philosophy and the Philosophy of Feminism: Irigaray and the History of Western Metaphysics. Hypatia 12 (1):79 - 98.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Christine Battersby (1998). The Phenomenal Woman: Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #45,170 of 1,693,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #121,613 of 1,693,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?