Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):151-163 (2001)
|Abstract||Without rejecting Simone de Beauvoir's often cited feminist agenda, this paper takes up her less frequently noted insight – that woman's existence as the inessential other is more than a consequence of material dependency, and political inequality. This insight traces women's subordinated status to the effect of a patriarchal desire that produces and is sustained by a political imaginary that is not economically grounded and is not undermined by women's economic or political progress. Taking up this insight, this paper reads Beauvoir, Freud and Sade through each other, to critique the myths of femininity. It argues that unless feminists of the 21st century follow Beauvoir's logic of ambiguity to challenge the ways in which sexed and gendered subjectivity is currently structured, the place of the inessential other will be preserved, and the feminist vision will be betrayed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sara Heinämaa (1997). What Is a Woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the Foundations of the Sexual Difference. Hypatia 12 (1):20 - 39.
Eva Lundgren-Gothlin (1999). Simone de Beauvoir’s Notions of Appeal, Desire, and Ambiguity and Their Relationship to Jean-Paul Sartre’s Notions of Appeal and Desire. Hypatia 14 (4).
Eva Gothlin (1999). Simone de Beauvoir's Notions of Appeal, Desire, and Ambiguity and Their Relationship to Jean-Paul Sartre's Notions of Appeal and Desire. Hypatia 14 (4):83 - 95.
Karen Vintges (1999). Simone de Beauvoir: A Feminist Thinker for Our Times. Hypatia 14 (4):133 - 144.
Karen Green (2002). The Other as Another Other. Hypatia 17 (4):1-15.
Karen Vintges (2001). 'Must We Burn Foucault?' Ethics as Art of Living: Simone de Beauvoir and Michel Foucault. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):165-181.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #26,147 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?