Ethics, Policy and Environment 12 (3):337-341 (forthcoming)
|Abstract||The broad scope and coherence of Natural Beauty are among its major strengths. Moore's syncretic theory tries to integrate diverse and sometimes conflicting theoretical strands. Of special importance is his recognition that the natural world is a social institution embodying perceptions that are conditioned, experiences communicated through language, and social beliefs and conventions. These lead him to consider the natural world as actually artifactual, and he terms it the 'natureworld'. Among the consequences of this is the reciprocity of natural and artistic beauty, one indication of the inclusiveness that runs through his theory. My central concern is whether Moore's syncretic theory can successfully combine disparate features of conflicting theories, such as cognitivism and non-cognitivism, and subjectivism and objectivism. Another concern is whether his syncretism can resolve problems such as the apparent inconsistencies raised by his discussion of framing. Here, alternatives that Moore had presumably settled reappear, as when objects, which had presumably been replaced by experiences, re-emerge in his discussion of framing. These comments identify such difficulties and ask whether the way out may be to reframe not natural beauty but the terms of the question|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alejandro Garcia-Rivera, Mark Graves & Carl Neumann (2009). Beauty in the Living World. Zygon 44 (2):243-263.
Ronald Moore (forthcoming). The Syncretic Approach to Natural Beauty: What It Is and What It Isn't. Ethics, Policy and Environment 12 (3):357-365.
Glenn Parsons (forthcoming). Science, Nature, and Moore's Syncretic Aesthetic. Ethics, Policy and Environment 12 (3):351-356.
Dan Vaillancourt (2008). Natural Beauty: A Theory of Aesthetics Beyond the Artsby Moore, Ronald. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):303-305.
Rodolphe Gasché (2002). The Theory of Natural Beauty and its Evil Star: Kant, Hegel, Adorno. Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):103-122.
Roger Scruton (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.
Nick Zangwill (2001). Formal Natural Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224.
Richard Cartwright Austin (1985). Beauty: A Foundation for Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 7 (3):197-208.
Peter K. Walhout (2009). The Beautiful and the Sublime in Natural Science. Zygon 44 (4):757-776.
Stephanie Ross (forthcoming). When Philosophers Want to Have It All: Comments on Ron Moore's Syncretic Theory of Natural Beauty. Ethics, Policy and Environment 12 (3):343-349.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?