David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):127-128 (2011)
The first four chapters of Pippin's elegant volume on Nietzsche were originally delivered as a series of lectures at the Collège de France in 2004. In a certain respect, the context of these lectures defines the parameters of Pippin's reading of Nietzsche: he advocates an interpretation very close to Bernard Williams in emphasizing the psychological aspects and motifs of Nietzsche's thought over and against certain contemporary French appropriations . In over-emphasizing the deconstructive capacity of Nietzsche's text, Pippin holds, these interpretations conclude that Nietzsche's thought provides no philosophical insight—that "Nietzsche's texts always seem to take away with one hand what they appear to have given with the other". In sharp contrast, Pippin claims that Nietzsche's thought is extremely relevant philosophically insofar as it deals with the genealogy of human desires and actions. Put differently, Nietzsche's philosophical teaching is first and foremost a psychology. For this reason, Pippin's book amounts to a sustained attempt to "present a comprehensive interpretation of what Nietzsche means by 'psychology,' what the relationship is … between psychology and traditional
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Katsafanas (forthcoming). Philosophical Psychology as a Basis for Ethics. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (2):297-314.
Carl B. Sachs (2008). Nietzsche's Daybreak. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):81-100.
Robert B. Pippin (2010). Nietzsche, Psychology, and First Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press.
Lucy Huskinson (2004). Nietzsche and Jung: The Whole Self in the Union of Opposites. Brunner-Routledge.
Joel Smith (2003). Review of F. Nietzsche, Writings From the Late Notebooks. Edited by R. Bittner and Translated by K. Sturge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Writings 22:69-71.
Kathleen O'Dwyer (forthcoming). Nietzsche's Challenge: Eternal Recurrence. Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
Daw-Nay R. Evans (2003). Nietzsche's Postmoralism: Essays on Nietzsche's Prelude to Philosophy's Future (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 25 (1):93-95.
Michael Platt (2011). Nietzsche, Psychology, & First Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 64 (4):874-876.
Brian Leiter (2009). Nietzsche's Theory of the Will. In Ken Gemes & Simon May (eds.), Philosophical Topics. Oxford University Press. 119-137.
A. E. Denham (2013). Attuned, Transcendent & Transfigured: Nietzsche's Aesthetic Psychology. In Daniel Came (ed.), Nietzsche on Art & Life. Oxford.
Graham Parkes (1996). Book Review: Composing the Soul: Reaches of Nietzsche's Psychology. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 20 (2).
Martha Nussbaum (1997). Is Nietzsche a Political Thinker? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):1 – 13.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39 (1):434-454.
Peter S. Groff (2010). Nietzsche and Islam (Review). Philosophy East and West 60 (3):430-437.
Added to index2010-12-23
Total downloads9 ( #223,023 of 1,696,561 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #142,346 of 1,696,561 )
How can I increase my downloads?