David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):353-374 (2000)
This paper examines and defends the view that the immediate objects of visual perception, or what are often called sense data, are parts of the facing surfaces of physical objects-the naturalized sense data theory. Occasionally defended in the literature on the philosophy of perception, most famously by G. E. Moore , it has not proved popular and indeed was abandoned by Moore himself. The contemporary situation in the philosophy of perception seems ripe for a revaluation of the NSD theory. however. The NSD theory allows us to accommodate the very real shortcomings in uncritical direct realism without postulating the existence of non-physical sense data in a way that has seemed to many incompatible with any robust form of philosophical naturalism.The argument to establish the NSD theory proceeds in two stages. In §II I argue against the direct realist that we perceive three-dimensional material objects in virtue of perceiving parts of their surfaces. The argument for this conclusion involves clearly distinguishing between two notions that have tended to be run together in discussions of perception---namely, immediate perception and direct perception. In §III I argue against the sense-datum theorist that those parts of the surfaces of those objects are not themselves perceived in virtue of the perception of anything else
|Keywords||Epistemology Perception Sense Data Vision|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Casey O'Callaghan (forthcoming). Objects for Multisensory Perception. Philosophical Studies:1-21.
Casey O'Callaghan (2011). Lessons From Beyond Vision (Sounds and Audition). Philosophical Studies 153 (1):143-160.
Casey O'Callaghan (2008). Seeing What You Hear: Cross-Modal Illusions and Perception. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):316-338.
Similar books and articles
Clement W. K. Mundle (1971). Perception: Facts And Theories. London,: Oxford University Press,.
H. V. Stainsby (1970). Sight and Sense-Data. Mind 79 (April):170-187.
Michael D. Fish (1968). Are Sense-Data Material Things? Logique Et Analyse 11 (December):459-467.
Virginia Presson (1951). G.E. Moore's Theory of Sense-Data. Journal of Philosophy 48 (January):34-41.
R. C. Meyers (1971). A Note on Sense-Data and Depth Perception. Mind 80 (July):437-440.
E. J. Lowe (1981). Indirect Perception and Sense Data. Philosophical Quarterly 31 (October):330-342.
N. Mishra (1960). The Role of Sense-Data in Perception. Philosophical Quarterly (India) 33 (April):41-48.
José Luis Bermúdez (2000). Naturalized Sense Data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):353 - 374.
Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (2001). Sense Data: The Sensible Approach. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):17-63.
G. E. Davie (1954). Common Sense and Sense-Data. Philosophical Quarterly 4 (July):229-246.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #42,840 of 1,725,194 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #110,379 of 1,725,194 )
How can I increase my downloads?