Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Gustav Bergmann (1949). Professor Ayer's Analysis of Knowing. Analysis 9 (June):98-106.
Discussion of Gustav Bergmann, Professor Ayer's analysis of knowing
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.
Similar books and articles
This paper outlines how we may understand knowing-that as a kind of knowing-how-to, and thereby as an ability. (Contrast this form of analysis with the more commonly attempted reduction, of knowing-how-to to knowing-that.) The sort of ability in question has much potential complexity. In general, questioning can, but need not, be part of this complexity. However, questioning is always an element in the complexity that is philosophical knowing. The paper comments on the nature of this particular form of knowing.
On the basis of Professor Ayer's The Problem of Knowledge , Mr. Stigen criticizes Ayer for defending a position which the sceptic does not attack. Ayer's “descriptive analysis”, which is his answer to the sceptic, consists in an analysis of statements about, e.g. material objects or other minds into verifiable propositions. In other words, Ayer points to the fact that our statements are shown to be true by verification. However, according to Stigen, this analysis does not remove the sceptic's doubts, (...)
Knowing as having the right to be sure, by A. J. Ayer.--Knowledge and belief, by N. Malcolm.--Is justified true belief knowledge? By E. L. Gettier.--The foundation of empirical statements, by R. M. Chisholm.--Knowledge, truth, and evidence, by K. Lehrer.--A causal theory of knowing, by A. I. Goldman.--The explication of 'X knows that p', by B. Skyrms.--An analysis of factual knowledge, by P. Unger.--Why I know so much more than you do, by W. W. Rozeboom.--Does knowing imply believing? By J. Harrison.--Knowledge, (...)

