Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||A logic is called 'paraconsistent' if it rejects the rule called 'ex contradictione quodlibet', according to which any conclusion follows from inconsistent premises. While logicians have proposed many technically developed paraconsistent logical systems and contemporary philosophers like Graham Priest have advanced the view that some contradictions can be true, and advocated a paraconsistent logic to deal with them, until recent times these systems have been little understood by philosophers. This book presents a comprehensive overview on paraconsistent logical systems to change this situation. The book includes almost every major author currently working in the field. The papers are on the cutting edge of the literature some of which discuss current debates and others present important new ideas. The editors have avoided papers about technical details of paraconsistent logic, but instead concentrated upon works that discuss more 'big picture' ideas. Different treatments of paradoxes takes centre stage in many of the papers, but also there are several papers on how to interpret paraconistent logic and some on how it can be applied to philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of language, and metaphysics.|
|Keywords||Paraconsistency Paraconsistent Logic Non-Classical Logic Dialetheism Logical Paradoxes Relevant Logic Paraconsistent Set Theory Vagueness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Newton C. A. da Costa & Décio Krause, Remarks on the Applications of Paraconsistent Logic to Physics.
Greg Restall (2002). Paraconsistency Everywhere. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli (1986). On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic. Philosophia 16 (3-4).
Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli (1986). On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic. Philosophia 16 (3-4):293-305.
O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky (2011). Ideal Paraconsistent Logics. Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
Joke Meheus (2000). An Extremely Rich Paraconsistent Logic and the Adaptive Logic Based on It. In Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic. Research Studies Press.
Andrzej Wiśniewski, Guido Vanackere & Dorota Leszczyńska (2005). Socratic Proofs and Paraconsistency: A Case Study. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):431 - 466.
Bryson Brown (1999). Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
M. W. Bunder (1984). Some Definitions of Negation Leading to Paraconsistent Logics. Studia Logica 43 (1-2):75 - 78.
Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron (2009). A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox. Principia 13 (3):299-326.
Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez (2010). Paraconsistent Logics Included in Lewis’ S4. Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (03):442-466.
Graham Priest (1991). Minimally Inconsistent LP. Studia Logica 50 (2):321 - 331.
Added to index2010-11-04
Total downloads34 ( #40,578 of 733,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #4,055 of 733,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?