Inquiry 11 (1-4):227 – 242 (1968)
|Abstract||The application of semantical concepts such as synonymy and interpretation to actual situations of usage gives rise to perplexing problems. One of the few attempts to tackle these problems has been carried out by Arne Naess. Further advances along this line may become possible after a clarification of the basic concepts employed. The discussion centers around empirical synonymy and certain other notions built on this concept by Naess. Possible ways of making the system coherent are indicated.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ingemund Gullvåg (1975). Naess's Pluralistic Metaphilosophy1. Inquiry 18 (4):391-408.
Gary H. Merrill (2009). Concepts and Synonymy in the UMLS Metathesaurus. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration 4 (7).
Yoad Winter, Course Description: The Course Will Give a Concise Introduction to Compositional Modeltheoretic Semantics in the Montague Tradition, with Ample Discussion and Motivation Coming..
Siobhan Chapman (2011). Arne Naess and Empirical Semantics. Inquiry 54 (1):18-30.
Harold Glasser (1996). Naess's Deep Ecology Approach and Environmental Policy. Inquiry 39 (2):157 – 187.
Tuomas K. Pernu (2008). Philosophy and the Front Line of Science. The Quarterly Review of Biology 83 (1):29-36.
Ingemund Gullvåg (1988). Remarks on Wittgenstein's Über Gewissheit and a Norwegian Discussion. Inquiry 31 (3):371 – 385.
Siri Naess & Arne Naess (1960). Psychological Research and Humean Problems. Philosophy of Science 27 (2):134-146.
Benjamin Howe (2010). Was Arne Naess Recognized as the Founder of Deep Ecology Prematurely? Semantics and Environmental Philosophy. Environmental Ethics 32 (4):369-383.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads2 ( #232,265 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?