American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):28-33 (2012)
|Abstract||The computer revolution has had an enormous effect on all aspects of the practice of medicine, yet little thought has been given to the role of social media in identifying treatment choices for incompetent patients. We are currently living in the ?Internet age? and many people have integrated social media into all aspects of their lives. As use becomes more prevalent, and as users age, social media are more likely to be viewed as a source of information regarding medical care preferences. This article explores the ethical and legal issues raised by the use of social media in surrogate decision making|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jessica Berg (2012). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age”. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):W1-W2.
Dallas M. High & Howard B. Turner (1987). Surrogate Decision-Making: The Elderly's Familial Expectations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Jessica A. Moore & Colleen M. Gallagher (2012). Are We Prepared for Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age? American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):47-49.
Kristine Bærøe (2010). Patient Autonomy, Assessment of Competence and Surrogate Decision-Making: A Call for Reasonableness in Deciding for Others. Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Allen E. Buchanan (1989). Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decisionmaking. Cambridge University Press.
Elysa R. Koppelman (2002). Dementia and Dignity: Towards a New Method of Surrogate Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85.
Nancey Trevanian Tsai (2012). Considerations in Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):51-51.
Teresa Blankmeyer Burke (2012). A Disability Response to Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):36-37.
Mats Johansson & Linus Broström (2008). Turning Failures Into Successes: A Methodological Shortcoming in Empirical Research on Surrogate Accuracy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
Rosamond Rhodes & Ian Holzman (2004). The Not Unreasonable Standard for Assessment of Surrogates and Surrogate Decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386.
Mats Johansson & Linus Broström (2011). Counterfactual Reasoning in Surrogate Decision Making – Another Look. Bioethics 25 (5):244-249.
Linus Broström, The Substituted Judgment Standard. Studies on the Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.
Ruiping Fan (2002). Reconsidering Surrogate Decision Making: Aristotelianism and Confucianism on Ideal Human Relations. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):346-372.
Greg Clarke, Robert T. Hall & Greg Rosencrance (2004). Physician-Patient Relations: No More Models. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19.
Göran Collste (2002). The Internet Doctor and Medical Ethics Ethical Implications of the Introduction of the Internet Into Medical Encounters. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):121-125.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-14
Total downloads1 ( #291,125 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?