Social desirability response bias, gender, and factors influencing organizational commitment: An international study [Book Review]
Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):797 - 809 (2008)
|Abstract||This research is an extension of Walker Information’s (Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, pp. 235–255, 1999) study on employees’ job attitudes that was conducted exclusively in the United States. Walker Information found that the reputation of the organization, fairness at work, care, and concern for employees, trust in employees, and resources available at work were important factors in an employee’s decision to remain with his or her company. Our sample includes 713 students from seven countries: Canada, Colombia, Ecuador, Hong Kong, Ireland, South Africa, and the United States. When analyzing the entire sample, our data indicate that both social desirability response bias and gender were significant; however, this was not the case when the data are analyzed by country. On an individual country basis, our data suggest that the generally accepted premise that women are more ethically conscious than men was only true for the samples from the United States and Canada. The data also indicate that, while social desirability response bias was significant for the four factors suggesting ethical components for the sample from the United States, this finding was not universal.|
|Keywords||social desirability response bias organization commitment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Randi L. Sims (2002). Support for the Use of Deception Within the Work Environment: A Comparison of Israeli and United States Employee Attitudes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (1):27 - 34.
Richard Bernardi, Caryn Lecca, Jennifer Murphy & Elizabeth Sturgis (2011). Does Education Influence Ethical Decisions? An International Study. Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):235-256.
Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
Richard A. Bernardi, Michael B. Witek & Michael R. Melton (2009). A Four-Country Study of the Associations Between Bribery and Unethical Actions. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):389 - 403.
A. Bernardi Richard, B. Witek Michael & R. Melton Michael (2009). A Four-Country Study of the Associations Between Bribery and Unethical Actions. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3).
Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe (2003). Exploring Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
Weihui Fu, Satish P. Deshpande & Xiao Zhao (2011). The Impact of Ethical Behavior and Facets of Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment of Chinese Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):537-543.
Donna M. Randall & Maria F. Fernandes (1991). The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):805 - 817.
Satish P. Deshpande, Jacob Joseph & Rashmi Prasad (2006). Factors Impacting Ethical Behavior in Hospitals. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):207 - 216.
Richard A. Bernardi (2006). Associations Between Hofstede's Cultural Constructs and Social Desirability Response Bias. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):43 - 53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,362 of 722,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,869 )
How can I increase my downloads?