Science, Law, and the Search for Truth in the Courtroom: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (1):6-20 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSusan Haack (2007). Peer Review and Publication: Lessons for Lawyers. Stetson Law Review 36 (3).
Susan Haack (2008). Of Truth, in Science and in Law. Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2).
Susan Haack (2008). Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert. Journal of Health and Biomedical Law 4:253-289.
David Mercer (2008). Science, Legitimacy, and “Folk Epistemology” in Medicine and Law: Parallels Between Legal Reforms to the Admissibility of Expert Evidence and Evidence-Based Medicine. Social Epistemology 22 (4):405 – 423.
Eric A. Youngstrom & Christine Pellegrini Busch (2000). Expert Testimony in Psychology: Ramifications of Supreme Court Decision in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael. Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):185 – 193.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1959). Book Review:On Shame and the Search for Identity Helen Merrell Lynd. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 26 (1):51-.
Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith (1991). Neo-Kantianism and Phenomenology. The Case of Emil Lask and Johannes Daubert. Kant-Studien 82 (3).
Lloyd Strickland (forthcoming). Philosophy and the Search for Truth. Philosophia:1-16.
K. Schuhmann & B. Smith (1985). Against Idealism: Johannes Daubert Vs. Husserl's Ideas I. The Review of Metaphysics 38 (4):763 - 793.
Charles P. Nemeth (2001). Aquinas in the Courtroom: Lawyers, Judges, and Judicial Conduct. Greenwood Press.
Michael Lynch & Ruth Mcnally (1999). Science, Common Sense and Common Law: Courtroom Inquiries and the Public Understanding of Science. Social Epistemology 13 (2):183-196.
Michael Lynch & Ruth Mcnally (1999). Science, Common Sense and Common Law: Courtroom Inquiries and the Public Understanding of Science. Social Epistemology 13 (2):183 – 196.
SolomonEyal Shimony (2001). Bernard Robertson and G. A. [Tony] Vignaux, Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-31Total downloads22 ( #56,255 of 549,551 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,551 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
