David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 22 (1-4):281 – 320 (1979)
To improve our methods of rational inquiry and decision-making we need to recognize that such methods should guide but not fully determine the choices of individuals. Failure to acknowledge the essential incompleteness of rational methods made the methods of Classical Rationalism quite impractical and opened them to skeptical refutation. Mitigated Skepticism and Fideism failed to correct the error, and as a result put undesirable limits on rational inquiry. When the guiding character of rational methods is recognized, existing methods of scientific research of personal and social decision-making can themselves be rationally assessed and improved. Viewing rational methods as guides thus opens a whole field of inquiry, the inquiry into what rational methods are most useful for specific purposes and in specific situations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Karl R. Popper (1966). The Open Society and its Enemies. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
William Warren Bartley (1984). The Retreat to Commitment. Open Court Pub. Co..
Spiro J. Latsis (1972). Situational Determinism in Economics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):207-245.
Michael Polanyi (1964). Science, Faith, and Society. University of Chicago Press.
Richard H. Popkin (1964). The History of Scepticism From Erasmus to Descartes. New York, Humanities Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donald W. Bruckner (2007). Rational Responsibility for Preferences and Moral Responsibility for Character Traits. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:191-209.
Nicholas Maxwell (1984). From Knowledge to Wisdom: A Revolution in the Aims and Methods of Science. Basil Blackwell.
Nicholas Maxwell (2005). A Revolution for Science and the Humanities: From Knowledge to Wisdom. Dialogue and Universalism 15 (1-2):29-57.
Robert Stern (2006). Hegel's Doppelsatz: A Neutral Reading. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):235-266.
Darrell P. Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno (2009). Why Advocate Pancritical Rationalism? In R. S. Cohen & Z. Parusniková (eds.), Rethinking Popper, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer 81--89.
Paul Draper (2004). On the Nature of Naturalism. Philo 7 (2):146-155.
Nicholas Maxwell (1984). From Knowledge to Wisdom: Guiding Choices in Scientific Research. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 4:316-334..
Alan Nelson (ed.) (2005). A Companion to Rationalism. Blackwell Pub..
Yotam Lurie & Robert Albin (2007). Moral Dilemmas in Business Ethics: From Decision Procedures to Edifying Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):195 - 207.
Paul Kurtz (2010). Exuberant Skepticism. Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads13 ( #268,776 of 1,902,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,168 of 1,902,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?