Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31 (2008)
|Abstract||Genetic testing is currently subject to little oversight, despite the significant ethical issues involved. Repeated recommendations for increased regulation of the genetic testing market have led to little progress in the policy arena. A 2005 Internet search identified 13 websites offering health-related genetic testing for direct purchase by the consumer. Further examination of these sites showed that overall, biotech companies are not providing enough information for consumers to make well-informed decisions; they are not consistently offering genetic counseling services; and some sites even offer tests with little evidence of clinical value. This article aims to raise company and consumer awareness about the ethical concerns surrounding the direct-to-consumer marketing of health-related genetic tests. It also suggests ways that biotech companies can bring their services to the public in an ethically responsible manner, without increased regulatory oversight.|
|Keywords||direct-to-consumer marketing direct-to-consumer sales DNA test genetic test Internet marketing ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eline Bunnik, Maartje Schermer & A. Cecile Janssens (2011). Personal Genome Testing: Test Characteristics to Clarify the Discourse on Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):11-.
Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones (2002). Ethics and Genetics: Susceptibility Testing in the Workplace. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235 - 241.
Suli Sui & Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner (2007). Commercial Genetic Testing in Mainland China: Social, Financial and Ethical Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):229-237.
Timothy Caulfield (2011). That Personal TouchTo the EditorTo the EditorTo the EditorTo the EditorLeonard M. Fleck repliesErrata. Hastings Center Report 41 (3).
Felix Thiele (2003). Genetic Tests in the Insurance System: Criteria for a Moral Evaluation. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):185-195.
Ellen Matloff & Arthur Caplan (2008). Direct to Confusion: Lessons Learned From Marketing Brca Testing. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):5 – 8.
Ludvig Beckman (2004). Are Genetic Self-Tests Dangerous? Assessing the Commercialization of Genetic Testing in Terms of Personal Autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Claudia Wild (2007). Polymorphism-Screening: Genetic Testing for Predisposition—Guidance for Technology Assessment. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):1-14.
Barabara Biesecker (1998). Future Directions in Genetic Counseling: Practical and Ethical Considerations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):145-160.
Anders Nordgren (2010). The Rhetoric Appeal to Identity on Websites of Companies Offering Non-Health-Related DNA Testing. Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):473-487.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #41,906 of 722,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?