The ethics of Cesarean section on maternal request: A feminist critique of the american college of obstetricians and gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery
Bioethics 21 (9):478–487 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKathy Davis (1991). Remaking the She-Devil: A Critical Look at Feminist Approaches to Beauty. Hypatia 6 (2):21 - 43.
Sylvia Burrow (2012). On The Cutting Edge: Ethical Responsiveness to Cesarean Section Rates. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):44-52.
Sonya Charles (2011). Obstetricians and Violence Against Women. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):51-56.
Laurence B. McCullough (1999). A Basic Concept in the Clinical Ethics of Managed Care: Physicians and Institutions as Economically Disciplined Moral Co-Fiduciaries of Populations of Patients. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):77 – 97.
Tore Nilstun, Marwan Habiba, Goran Lingman, Rudolfo Saracci, Monica Da Fre & Marina Cuttini (2008). Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Can the Ethical Problem Be Solved by the Principlist Approach? BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):11-.
Martha Sañudo & Inmaculada De Melo-Martín (2009). Monterrey, C-Section Capital of Mexico: Examining the Ethical Dimensions. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):148 - 164.
Victoria Seavilleklein (2009). Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening. Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
