David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):597-605 (2011)
In order to fulfill ABET requirements, Northern Arizona University’s Civil and Environmental engineering programs incorporate professional ethics in several of its engineering courses. This paper discusses an ethics module in a 3rd year engineering design course that focuses on the design process and technical writing. Engineering students early in their student careers generally possess good black/white critical thinking skills on technical issues. Engineering design is the first time students are exposed to “grey” or multiple possible solution technical problems. To identify and solve these problems, the engineering design process is used. Ethical problems are also “grey” problems and present similar challenges to students. Students need a practical tool for solving these ethical problems. The step-wise engineering design process was used as a model to demonstrate a similar process for ethical situations. The ethical decision making process of Martin and Schinzinger was adapted for parallelism to the design process and presented to students as a step-wise technique for identification of the pertinent ethical issues, relevant moral theories, possible outcomes and a final decision. Students had greatest difficulty identifying the broader, global issues presented in an ethical situation, but by the end of the module, were better able to not only identify the broader issues, but also to more comprehensively assess specific issues, generate solutions and a desired response to the issue
|Keywords||Engineering ethics Professional ethics Engineering design Teaching ethics to engineers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Davis (2006). Engineering Ethics, Individuals, and Organizations. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):223-231.
Glenn C. Graber & Christopher D. Pionke (2006). A Team-Taught Interdisciplinary Approach to Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):313-320.
Citations of this work BETA
William R. Wilson (2013). Using the Chernobyl Incident to Teach Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):625-640.
Similar books and articles
Simon Robinson (ed.) (2007). Engineering, Business and Professional Ethics. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Peter Lloyd & Ibo van de Poel (2008). Designing Games to Teach Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):433-447.
Peter Lloyd & Jerry Busby (2003). “Things That Went Well — No Serious Injuries or Deaths”: Ethical Reasoning in a Normal Engineering Design Process. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):503-516.
George D. Catalano (2004). Senior Capstone Design and Ethics: A Bridge to the Professional World. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):409-415.
Steven P. Nichols (2000). An Approach to Integrating “Professional Responsibility” in Engineering Into the Capstone Design Experience. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):399-412.
Robert E. McGinn (2003). “Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Caroline Whitbeck (1998). Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge University Press.
Mary L. Cummings (2006). Integrating Ethics in Design Through the Value-Sensitive Design Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):701-715.
Ibo Poel (2001). Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.
Andrew Lau (2004). Teaching Engineering Ethics to First-Year College Students. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):359-368.
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads19 ( #98,712 of 1,413,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,079 of 1,413,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?