David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Rosemarie D. L. C. Bernabe, Ghislaine J. M. W. Van Thiel, Jan A. M. Raaijmakers & Johannes J. M. Van Delden
Bmc Medical Ethics 2012 13 14 (1):6- (2013)
BackgroundThe Netherlands is one of the few countries where euthanasia is legal under strict conditions. This study investigates whether Dutch newspaper articles use the term ‘euthanasia’ according to the legal definition and determines what arguments for and against euthanasia they contain.MethodsWe did an electronic search of seven Dutch national newspapers between January 2009 and May 2010 and conducted a content analysis.ResultsOf the 284 articles containing the term ‘euthanasia’, 24% referred to practices outside the scope of the law, mostly relating to the forgoing of life-prolonging treatments and assistance in suicide by others than physicians. Of the articles with euthanasia as the main topic, 36% described euthanasia in the context of a terminally ill patient, 24% for older persons, 16% for persons with dementia, and 9% for persons with a psychiatric disorder. The most frequent arguments for euthanasia included the importance of self-determination and the fact that euthanasia contributes to a good death. The most frequent arguments opposing euthanasia were that suffering should instead be alleviated by better care, that providing euthanasia can be disturbing, and that society should protect the vulnerable.ConclusionsOf the newspaper articles, 24% uses the term ‘euthanasia’ for practices that are outside the scope of the euthanasia law. Typically, the more unusual cases are discussed. This might lead to misunderstandings between citizens and physicians. Despite the Dutch legalisation of euthanasia, the debate about its acceptability and boundaries is ongoing and both sides of the debate are clearly represented
|Keywords||Euthanasia Media Content analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Annette Rid & David Wendler (2011). A Framework for Risk-Benefit Evaluations in Biomedical Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):141-179.
Charles Weijer (2000). The Ethical Analysis of Risk. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):344-361.
D. Wendler & F. G. Miller (2007). Assessing Research Risks Systematically: The Net Risks Test. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):481-486.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jos V. M. Welie (1992). The Medical Exception: Physicians, Euthanasia and the Dutch Criminal Law. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):419-437.
Martin Van Hees (2003). Voluntariness, Suffering and Euthanasia. Philosophical Explorations 6 (1):50 – 64.
Shi Pdau (1991). Euthanasia in China: A Report. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (2).
Cees M. P. M. Hertogh, Marike E. de Boer, Rose-Marie Dröes & Jan A. Eefsting (2007). Would We Rather Lose Our Life Than Lose Our Self? Lessons From the Dutch Debate on Euthanasia for Patients with Dementia. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):48 – 56.
John Keown (2002). Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation. Cambridge University Press.
Bert Gordijn & Rien Janssens (2001). New Developments in Dutch Legislation Concerning Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):299 – 309.
Margaret Otlowski (1997). Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Clarendon Press.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor (2002). Non-Voluntary and Involuntary Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Dutch Perspectives. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (5):161-179.
Asunción Álvarez Del Río & Ma Luisa Marván (2011). On Euthanasia: Exploring Psychological Meaning and Attitudes in a Sample of Mexican Physicians and Medical Students. Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):146-153.
A. C. Rietjens Judith, J. Der Maas Pauvanl, D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje, J. M. Delden Johannevans & Agnes van der Heide (2009). Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia From the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3).
Robert M. Baird & Stuart E. Rosenbaum (eds.) (1989). Euthanasia: The Moral Issues. Prometheus Books.
Jacqueline A. Laing (2012). Institutionalising Murder. Halsbury's Law Exchange.
Lisa Yount (ed.) (2002). Euthanasia. Greenhaven Press.
Leslie Pickering Francis (1993). Advance Directives for Voluntary Euthanasia: A Volatile Combination? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):297-322.
Joseph Parkinson (2010). Euthanasia in Western Australia 2010: Background and Analysis. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (2):1.
Added to index2012-04-21
Total downloads26 ( #66,963 of 1,101,660 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #11,395 of 1,101,660 )
How can I increase my downloads?