David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):391-410 (2012)
The Global Competitiveness Report raises ethical issues on multiple levels. The traditional high ranking accorded the US is largely attributable to fallacies, poor science and ideology. The ideological bias finds expression in two ways: the inclusion of indices that do not provide competitive advantage, but that fit the Anglo/US ideology; and the exclusion of indices that are known to offer competitive advantage, but that do not fit the Anglo/US ideology. This flaw is compounded by methodological problems that raise further doubt as to the reliability and validity of the survey results. The resultant false high ranking of the US, a strong proponent of Anglo/US capitalism, pseudo-legitimizes the propensity of US-dominated institutions and entities to persuade, coerce and, in the worst-case force other countries and their constituents to adopt Anglo/US practices and behaviours. This is ethically reprehensible because research shows that these practices and behaviours, when compared with other approaches, are sub-optimal in the results they produce for individuals, corporations and nations. The report also unjustly and unnecessarily stigmatizes entire groups of countries with little conceivable benefit to anyone. Given the report’s gravitas through the profound global influence it exerts on the decisions of top government and business leaders, these are serious ethical and economic issues.
|Keywords||Competitiveness Corporate social responsibility Ethics Ideology National rankings Organizational performance Research methodology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Danielle Beu & M. Ronald Buckley (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):57 - 73.
John Douglas Bishop (2000). A Framework for Discussing Normative Theories of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):563-591.
David S. Gelb & Joyce A. Strawser (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):1 - 13.
Anita Jose & Mary S. Thibodeaux (1999). Institutionalization of Ethics: The Perspective of Managers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 22 (2):133 - 143.
John Ladd (1970). Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations. The Monist 54 (4):488-516.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yungwook Kim (2003). Ethical Standards and Ideology Among Korean Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):209 - 223.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1996). Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174.
Philippe Gugler & Jacylyn Y. J. Shi (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility for Developing Country Multinational Corporations: Lost War in Pertaining Global Competitiveness? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):3 - 24.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1994). Ethical Ideology and Ethical Judgment Regarding Ethical Issues in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (6):469 - 480.
Peter E. Mudrack, James M. Bloodgood & William H. Turnley (2012). Some Ethical Implications of Individual Competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):347-359.
George Cabot Lodge (1982). The Connection Between Ethics and Ideology. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):85 - 98.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass, Gene Brown & Frederic J. Hebert (1998). Ethical Ideology and the Ethical Judgments of Marketing Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (7):715-723.
Patrick Van Kenhove, Iris Vermeir & Steven Verniers (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships Between Ethical Beliefs, Ethical Ideology, Political Preference and Need for Closure. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):347-361.
Patrick Van Kenhove, Iris Vermeir & Steven Verniers (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships Between Ethical Beliefs, Ethical Ideology, Political Preference and Need for Closure. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):347 - 361.
Oscar Javier Cárdenas Rodríguez (2009). Poverty Reduction Approaches in Mexico Since 1950: Public Spending for Social Programs and Economic Competitiveness Programs. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):269 - 281.
G. Rossouw (2012). Global Business Ethical Perspectives on Capitalism, Finance and Corporate Responsibility: The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis of 2008. [REVIEW] Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):63-72.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1985). Business Ethics, Ideology, and the Naturalistic Fallacy. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):227 - 232.
Michael W. Small (1995). Business Ethics and Commercial Morality: Report of the Royal Commission Into Commercial Activities. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):613 - 628.
Sarah Steenhaut & Patrick van Kenhove (2006). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships Among a Consumer's Personal Values, Ethical Ideology and Ethical Beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):137 - 155.
Kimberly Lenease King, Irene S. Houston & Renée A. Middleton (2001). An Explanation for School Failure: Moving Beyond Black Inferiority and Alienation as a Policy-Making Agenda. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (4):428 - 445.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-15
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?