Why physicalists needn't bother with Perry's recent response to the knowledge argument
Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):135-148 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Content Epistemology Knowledge Physicalism Reflexivity Perry, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTorin Alter, The Knowledge Argument. A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Michael W. Pelczar (2005). Enlightening the Fully Informed. Philosophical Studies 126 (1):29-56.
Tim Crane (2005). Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
Luca Malatesti (2008). Phenomenal Ways of Thinking. Teorema 27 (3):149-166.
Neil Van Leeuwen (2012). Perry on Self-Knowledge. In Albert Newen Raphael van Riel (ed.), Identity, Language, and Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of John Perry. CSLI Publications.
Pete Mandik (2010). Swamp Mary's Revenge: Deviant Phenomenal Knowledge and Physicalism. Philosophical Studies 148 (2).
Ted A. Warfield (1992). Privileged Self-Knowledge and Externalism Are Compatible. Analysis 52 (4):232-37.
Nathan Stemmer (1989). Physicalism and the Argument From Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (March):84-91.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
