Why physicalists needn't bother with Perry's recent response to the knowledge argument

Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):135-148 (2004)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Content  Epistemology  Knowledge  Physicalism  Reflexivity  Perry, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2004.tb00993.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Nathan Stemmer (1989). Physicalism and the Argument From Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (March):84-91.
Tim Crane (2005). Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
Torin Alter, The Knowledge Argument. A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Luca Malatesti (2008). Phenomenal Ways of Thinking. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):149-166.
David J. Chalmers (2004). Imagination, Indexicality, and Intensions. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):182-90.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

23 ( #126,253 of 1,724,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,552 of 1,724,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.