Propositions, Dispositions and Logical Knolwedge
In M. Bonelli & A. Longo (eds.), Quid Est Veritas? Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes. Bibliopolis (2010)
| Abstract | This paper considers the question of what knowing a logical rule consists in. I defend the view that knowing a logical rule is having propositional knowledge. Many philosophers reject this view and argue for the alternative view that knowing a logical rule is, at least at the fundamental level, having a disposition to infer according to it. To motivate this dispositionalist view, its defenders often appeal to Carroll’s regress argument in ‘What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’. I show that this dispositionalist view, and the regress that supposedly motivates it, operate with the wrong picture of what is involved in knowing a logical rule. In particular I show that it gives us the wrong picture of the relation between knowing a logical rule and actions of inferring according to it, as well as of the way in which knowing a logical rule might be a priori. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Logical Knowledge Lewis Carroll Regress Logical Constants | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
|
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Corine Besson, Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication (2010).
Corine Besson (2012). Logical Knowledge and Ordinary Reasoning. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):59-82.
Patrice Philie (2007). Carroll's Regress and the Epistemology of Logic. Philosophical Studies 134 (2):183 - 210.
A. B. Levison (1964). Wittgenstein and Logical Necessity. Inquiry 7 (1-4):367-373.
K. Warmbrod (1999). Logical Constants. Mind 108 (431):503-538.
Ken Warmbrōd (1999). Logical Constants. Mind 108 (431):503 - 538.
Jeffrey Foss (1976). A Rule of Minimal Rationality: The Logical Link Between Beliefs and Values. Inquiry 19 (1-4):341 – 353.
John MacFarlane, Logical Constants. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ignacio Jane (1997). Theoremhood and Logical Consequence. Theoria 12 (1):139-160.
Matti Eklund (2000). The Aims of Logical Empiricism As a Philosophy of Science. Acta Analytica 15:137-59.
Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2002). What is Logical Form? In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Clarendon Press.
Stephen Read (2010). General-Elimination Harmony and the Meaning of the Logical Constants. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39:557-76.
William H. Hanson (2003). Logic, the a Priori, and the Empirical. Theoria 18 (2):171-177.
Otávio Bueno & Scott A. Shalkowski (2009). Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind 118 (470):295 - 321.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-03-19Total downloads53 ( #19,364 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #1,992 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |

