Postscript: Plaut and Booth's (2006) New Simulations--What Have We Learned?

Psychological Review 113 (1):194-195 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Postscript: The way forward: Comment.Matthew M. Botvinick & David C. Plaut - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (4):928-928.
Why Monte Carlo Simulations Are Inferences and Not Experiments.Claus Beisbart & John D. Norton - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):403-422.
Experiments, Simulations, and Epistemic Privilege.Emily C. Parke - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (4):516-536.
Main currents of modern thought.Rudolf Eucken & Meyrick Booth - 1912 - London [etc.]: T. F. Unwin. Edited by Meyrick Booth.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
4 (#1,426,245)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?