Graduate studies at Western
In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge (2010)
|Abstract||A paradigmatic case of rigidity for singular terms is that of proper names. And it would seem that a paradigmatic case of rigidity for general terms is that of natural kind terms. However, many philosophers think that rigidity cannot be extended from singular terms to general terms. The reason for this is that rigidity appears to become trivial when such terms are considered: natural kind terms come out as rigid, but so do all other general terms, and in particular all descriptive general terms. This paper offers an account of rigidity for natural kind terms which does not trivialise in this way. On this account, natural kind terms are de jure obstinately rigid designators and other general terms, such as descriptive general terms, are not.|
|Keywords||Natural Kind Terms Rigidity Direct Reference Trivialisation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jussi Haukioja (2006). Proto-Rigidity. Synthese 150 (2):155 - 169.
Kathrin Koslicki (2008). Natural Kinds and Natural Kind Terms. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):789-802.
Corine Besson (2012). Empty Natural Kind Terms and Dry-Earth. Erkenntnis 76 (3):403-425.
Ben S. Cordry (2004). Necessity and Rigidly Designating Kind Terms. Philosophical Studies 119 (3):243-264.
Mario Gómez-Torrente (2006). Rigidity and Essentiality. Mind 115 (458):227-260.
Jussi Haukioja (2012). Rigidity and Actuality-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 157 (3):399-410.
Michael Devitt (2005). Rigid Application. Philosophical Studies 125 (2):139--165.
Richard Gray (2006). Natural Phenomenon Terms. Analysis 66 (290):141–148.
Stephen P. Schwartz (2002). Kinds, General Terms, and Rigidity: A Reply to LaPorte. Philosophical Studies 109 (3):265 - 277.
Added to index2010-05-19
Total downloads103 ( #7,407 of 739,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #5,258 of 739,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?