Some remarks on dr. Perelman's essay on logical antinomies
Mind 45 (180):487-488 (1936)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJane Macoubrie (2003). Logical Argument Structures in Decision-Making. Argumentation 17 (3):291-313.
Ch Perelman (1937). Résponse à MM. Grelling Et Beth. Mind 46 (182):278-279.
K. Reach (1938). The Name Relation and the Logical Antinomies. Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):97-111.
Barry Hartley Slater, Logical Paradoxes. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mario Gómez-Torrente (2003). The 'Must' and the 'Heptahedron': Remarks on Remarks. Theoria 18 (2):199-206.
N. Fotion & Gerard Elfstrom (1982). Some Remarks on Perelman's Energy Speculations. Ethics 92 (2):243-248.
I. I. I. Mootz (2010). Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4).
Oliver O'Donovan (1989). How Can Theology Be Moral? Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):81 - 94.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
