Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):65-74 (2012)
|Abstract||Scale is central to understanding nanotechnologies. These technologies are usually described as the understanding and control of matter at the nanoscale, with one nanometer being 10^-9 meter. At this scale, some materials gain new properties that can be used in the creation of new products. These properties may contribute to economic growth and social welfare but, conversely, they may also create negative effects, such as new risks to human health and the environment. As an emerging field whose consequences are still uncertain, the meanings of nanotechnologies are hotly contested|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Dilworth (2002). Varieties of Visual Representation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):183-206.
Chris Groves, Lori Frater, Robert Lee & Elen Stokes (2011). Is There Room at the Bottom for CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility and Nanotechnology in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):525-552.
Benjamin W. Tatler (2001). Re-Presenting the Case for Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1006-1007.
Jason Gaiger (2002). The Analysis of Pictorial Style. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):20-36.
John Dilworth (2005). A Double Content Theory of Artistic Representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):249–260.
Robert Briscoe (2009). Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):423 - 460.
Céline Kermisch (2012). Do New Ethical Issues Arise at Each Stage of Nanotechnological Development? Nanoethics 6 (1):29-37.
Judy S. DeLoache (2004). Scale Errors by Very Young Children: A Dissociation Between Action Planning and Control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):32-33.
William T. Wojtach (2009). Reconsidering Perceptual Content. Philosophy of Science 76 (1):22-43.
Bruce Bridgeman (1999). Implicit and Explicit Representations of Visual Space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):759-760.
Alan Petersen (2009). Introduction: The Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnologies. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):9-12.
Angela Mendelovici (2010). Mental Representation and Closely Conflated Topics. Dissertation, Princeton University
Bradley V. Stuart (1998). Visual Tasks Require Manipulable Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):480-480.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-04
Total downloads1 ( #291,386 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?